v5.0 pricing update: Team C panel recommendations (49/99/,499)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
<div class="price-card price-card--featured">
|
<div class="price-card price-card--featured">
|
||||||
<div class="ribbon">Most popular</div>
|
<div class="ribbon">Most popular</div>
|
||||||
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Pro</h3>
|
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Pro</h3>
|
||||||
<div class="price">$79<span>/mo</span></div>
|
<div class="price">$249<span>/mo</span></div>
|
||||||
<ul>
|
<ul>
|
||||||
<li>5 reviews per month</li>
|
<li>5 reviews per month</li>
|
||||||
<li>Full 11-seat panel</li>
|
<li>Full 11-seat panel</li>
|
||||||
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
</div>
|
</div>
|
||||||
<div class="price-card">
|
<div class="price-card">
|
||||||
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Enterprise</h3>
|
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Enterprise</h3>
|
||||||
<div class="price">$299<span>/mo</span></div>
|
<div class="price">$799<span>/mo</span></div>
|
||||||
<ul>
|
<ul>
|
||||||
<li>Unlimited reviews</li>
|
<li>Unlimited reviews</li>
|
||||||
<li>White-label branding</li>
|
<li>White-label branding</li>
|
||||||
@@ -741,6 +741,19 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
</ul>
|
</ul>
|
||||||
<div class="price-purpose">Purpose: proposal teams running color reviews</div>
|
<div class="price-purpose">Purpose: proposal teams running color reviews</div>
|
||||||
</div>
|
</div>
|
||||||
|
<div class="price-card">
|
||||||
|
<h3 style="margin-top:0">White-Label</h3>
|
||||||
|
<div class="price">$1,499<span>/mo</span></div>
|
||||||
|
<ul>
|
||||||
|
<li>Everything in Enterprise</li>
|
||||||
|
<li>Full white-label deployment on your domain</li>
|
||||||
|
<li>Custom judge pool configuration</li>
|
||||||
|
<li>Dedicated corpus isolation</li>
|
||||||
|
<li>Reseller pricing model (re-bill reviews at $200-500 each)</li>
|
||||||
|
<li>Priority support SLA</li>
|
||||||
|
</ul>
|
||||||
|
<div class="price-purpose">Purpose: consultancies and platforms reselling review as a service</div>
|
||||||
|
</div>
|
||||||
</div>
|
</div>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<h3>What a review costs us, and why the panel is affordable</h3>
|
<h3>What a review costs us, and why the panel is affordable</h3>
|
||||||
@@ -751,7 +764,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
health gate preventing wasted dispatches, sits well inside single-digit dollars.
|
health gate preventing wasted dispatches, sits well inside single-digit dollars.
|
||||||
</p>
|
</p>
|
||||||
<p>
|
<p>
|
||||||
The reason a full 11-seat panel fits a $79 tier at five reviews per month is vendor mix. Only
|
The reason a full 11-seat panel fits a $249 tier at five reviews per month is vendor mix. Only
|
||||||
a minority of seats run premium frontier models. The specialist Band B seats run strong
|
a minority of seats run premium frontier models. The specialist Band B seats run strong
|
||||||
mid-tier models from five different vendors, which is where the error-detection value came from
|
mid-tier models from five different vendors, which is where the error-detection value came from
|
||||||
in validation. Panel diversity is cheaper than panel depth, and diversity is what caught the 14.
|
in validation. Panel diversity is cheaper than panel depth, and diversity is what caught the 14.
|
||||||
@@ -778,17 +791,19 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
<table>
|
<table>
|
||||||
<thead><tr><th>Comparison</th><th>Their price</th><th>VerdictTank</th><th>Multiple</th></tr></thead>
|
<thead><tr><th>Comparison</th><th>Their price</th><th>VerdictTank</th><th>Multiple</th></tr></thead>
|
||||||
<tbody>
|
<tbody>
|
||||||
<tr><td>Pro vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$79/mo</td><td><strong>6.3x cheaper</strong></td></tr>
|
<tr><td>Pro vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$249/mo</td><td><strong>2.0x less</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr><td>Pro vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$79/mo</td><td><strong>11.4x cheaper</strong></td></tr>
|
<tr><td>Pro vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$249/mo</td><td><strong>3.6x less</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr><td>Enterprise vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$299/mo</td><td><strong>1.7x cheaper</strong></td></tr>
|
<tr><td>Enterprise vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$799/mo</td><td><strong>1.6x more</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr><td>Enterprise vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$299/mo</td><td><strong>3.0x cheaper</strong></td></tr>
|
<tr><td>Enterprise vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$799/mo</td><td><strong>1.1x less</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
|
<tr><td>White-Label vs AutogenAI</td><td>$30K+/yr custom</td><td>$1,499/mo</td><td><strong>1.7x less</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
</tbody>
|
</tbody>
|
||||||
</table>
|
</table>
|
||||||
<p>
|
<p>
|
||||||
We are not a proposal team in a box. We are one high-value pass in the workflow. A buyer already
|
We are not a proposal team in a box. We are one high-value pass in the workflow. A buyer already
|
||||||
spending $499 to $899 per month on an authoring tool should be able to add the error-detection
|
spending $499 to $899 per month on an authoring tool should be able to add the error-detection
|
||||||
layer without a second budget conversation. Pricing Pro at $79 makes VerdictTank an add-on
|
layer. Pricing Pro at $249 is below the GC AI critique seat benchmark at $500/mo,
|
||||||
decision rather than a platform decision.
|
and Enterprise at $799 is a peer price to the authoring tools that feed it.
|
||||||
|
White-Label at $1,499 makes resellers whole — they re-bill reviews at $200-500 each.
|
||||||
</p>
|
</p>
|
||||||
</section>
|
</section>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -812,7 +827,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
|
|||||||
<tr><td><strong>AutoRFP.ai</strong></td><td>Response automation</td><td>$899/mo Scale</td><td>Complementary. Reviews its drafts.</td></tr>
|
<tr><td><strong>AutoRFP.ai</strong></td><td>Response automation</td><td>$899/mo Scale</td><td>Complementary. Reviews its drafts.</td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr><td><strong>DeepRFP</strong></td><td>Lean-team authoring</td><td>$89/user/mo</td><td>Complementary. Lowest per-seat price in the category, natural partner.</td></tr>
|
<tr><td><strong>DeepRFP</strong></td><td>Lean-team authoring</td><td>$89/user/mo</td><td>Complementary. Lowest per-seat price in the category, natural partner.</td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr><td><strong>A solo frontier model</strong></td><td>DIY substitute</td><td>API cost only</td><td><strong>The real competitor.</strong> Measured: misses or underweights the material errors a panel catches.</td></tr>
|
<tr><td><strong>A solo frontier model</strong></td><td>DIY substitute</td><td>API cost only</td><td><strong>The real competitor.</strong> Measured: misses or underweights the material errors a panel catches.</td></tr>
|
||||||
<tr class="comp-table__us"><td><strong>VerdictTank</strong></td><td><strong>Panel error detection</strong></td><td><strong>Free / $79 Pro / $299 Enterprise</strong></td><td><strong>The only 11-seat, 9-vendor review panel with a published integrity gate</strong></td></tr>
|
<tr class="comp-table__us"><td><strong>VerdictTank</strong></td><td><strong>Panel error detection</strong></td><td><strong>Free / $249 Pro / $799 Enterprise / $1,499 White-Label</strong></td><td><strong>The only 11-seat, 9-vendor review panel with a published integrity gate</strong></td></tr>
|
||||||
</tbody>
|
</tbody>
|
||||||
</table>
|
</table>
|
||||||
<p class="table-note">
|
<p class="table-note">
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user