v5.0 pricing update: Team C panel recommendations (49/99/,499)

This commit is contained in:
root
2026-08-12 04:35:18 -04:00
parent 42ca1cefb2
commit 373060182e
+25 -10
View File
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
<div class="price-card price-card--featured"> <div class="price-card price-card--featured">
<div class="ribbon">Most popular</div> <div class="ribbon">Most popular</div>
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Pro</h3> <h3 style="margin-top:0">Pro</h3>
<div class="price">$79<span>/mo</span></div> <div class="price">$249<span>/mo</span></div>
<ul> <ul>
<li>5 reviews per month</li> <li>5 reviews per month</li>
<li>Full 11-seat panel</li> <li>Full 11-seat panel</li>
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
</div> </div>
<div class="price-card"> <div class="price-card">
<h3 style="margin-top:0">Enterprise</h3> <h3 style="margin-top:0">Enterprise</h3>
<div class="price">$299<span>/mo</span></div> <div class="price">$799<span>/mo</span></div>
<ul> <ul>
<li>Unlimited reviews</li> <li>Unlimited reviews</li>
<li>White-label branding</li> <li>White-label branding</li>
@@ -741,6 +741,19 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
</ul> </ul>
<div class="price-purpose">Purpose: proposal teams running color reviews</div> <div class="price-purpose">Purpose: proposal teams running color reviews</div>
</div> </div>
<div class="price-card">
<h3 style="margin-top:0">White-Label</h3>
<div class="price">$1,499<span>/mo</span></div>
<ul>
<li>Everything in Enterprise</li>
<li>Full white-label deployment on your domain</li>
<li>Custom judge pool configuration</li>
<li>Dedicated corpus isolation</li>
<li>Reseller pricing model (re-bill reviews at $200-500 each)</li>
<li>Priority support SLA</li>
</ul>
<div class="price-purpose">Purpose: consultancies and platforms reselling review as a service</div>
</div>
</div> </div>
<h3>What a review costs us, and why the panel is affordable</h3> <h3>What a review costs us, and why the panel is affordable</h3>
@@ -751,7 +764,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
health gate preventing wasted dispatches, sits well inside single-digit dollars. health gate preventing wasted dispatches, sits well inside single-digit dollars.
</p> </p>
<p> <p>
The reason a full 11-seat panel fits a $79 tier at five reviews per month is vendor mix. Only The reason a full 11-seat panel fits a $249 tier at five reviews per month is vendor mix. Only
a minority of seats run premium frontier models. The specialist Band B seats run strong a minority of seats run premium frontier models. The specialist Band B seats run strong
mid-tier models from five different vendors, which is where the error-detection value came from mid-tier models from five different vendors, which is where the error-detection value came from
in validation. Panel diversity is cheaper than panel depth, and diversity is what caught the 14. in validation. Panel diversity is cheaper than panel depth, and diversity is what caught the 14.
@@ -778,17 +791,19 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
<table> <table>
<thead><tr><th>Comparison</th><th>Their price</th><th>VerdictTank</th><th>Multiple</th></tr></thead> <thead><tr><th>Comparison</th><th>Their price</th><th>VerdictTank</th><th>Multiple</th></tr></thead>
<tbody> <tbody>
<tr><td>Pro vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$79/mo</td><td><strong>6.3x cheaper</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>Pro vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$249/mo</td><td><strong>2.0x less</strong></td></tr>
<tr><td>Pro vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$79/mo</td><td><strong>11.4x cheaper</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>Pro vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$249/mo</td><td><strong>3.6x less</strong></td></tr>
<tr><td>Enterprise vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$299/mo</td><td><strong>1.7x cheaper</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>Enterprise vs Bidara Starter</td><td>$499/mo</td><td>$799/mo</td><td><strong>1.6x more</strong></td></tr>
<tr><td>Enterprise vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$299/mo</td><td><strong>3.0x cheaper</strong></td></tr> <tr><td>Enterprise vs AutoRFP.ai Scale</td><td>$899/mo</td><td>$799/mo</td><td><strong>1.1x less</strong></td></tr>
<tr><td>White-Label vs AutogenAI</td><td>$30K+/yr custom</td><td>$1,499/mo</td><td><strong>1.7x less</strong></td></tr>
</tbody> </tbody>
</table> </table>
<p> <p>
We are not a proposal team in a box. We are one high-value pass in the workflow. A buyer already We are not a proposal team in a box. We are one high-value pass in the workflow. A buyer already
spending $499 to $899 per month on an authoring tool should be able to add the error-detection spending $499 to $899 per month on an authoring tool should be able to add the error-detection
layer without a second budget conversation. Pricing Pro at $79 makes VerdictTank an add-on layer. Pricing Pro at $249 is below the GC AI critique seat benchmark at $500/mo,
decision rather than a platform decision. and Enterprise at $799 is a peer price to the authoring tools that feed it.
White-Label at $1,499 makes resellers whole — they re-bill reviews at $200-500 each.
</p> </p>
</section> </section>
@@ -812,7 +827,7 @@ Financial Projections · Team / Execution · Risk Mitigation · Lega
<tr><td><strong>AutoRFP.ai</strong></td><td>Response automation</td><td>$899/mo Scale</td><td>Complementary. Reviews its drafts.</td></tr> <tr><td><strong>AutoRFP.ai</strong></td><td>Response automation</td><td>$899/mo Scale</td><td>Complementary. Reviews its drafts.</td></tr>
<tr><td><strong>DeepRFP</strong></td><td>Lean-team authoring</td><td>$89/user/mo</td><td>Complementary. Lowest per-seat price in the category, natural partner.</td></tr> <tr><td><strong>DeepRFP</strong></td><td>Lean-team authoring</td><td>$89/user/mo</td><td>Complementary. Lowest per-seat price in the category, natural partner.</td></tr>
<tr><td><strong>A solo frontier model</strong></td><td>DIY substitute</td><td>API cost only</td><td><strong>The real competitor.</strong> Measured: misses or underweights the material errors a panel catches.</td></tr> <tr><td><strong>A solo frontier model</strong></td><td>DIY substitute</td><td>API cost only</td><td><strong>The real competitor.</strong> Measured: misses or underweights the material errors a panel catches.</td></tr>
<tr class="comp-table__us"><td><strong>VerdictTank</strong></td><td><strong>Panel error detection</strong></td><td><strong>Free / $79 Pro / $299 Enterprise</strong></td><td><strong>The only 11-seat, 9-vendor review panel with a published integrity gate</strong></td></tr> <tr class="comp-table__us"><td><strong>VerdictTank</strong></td><td><strong>Panel error detection</strong></td><td><strong>Free / $249 Pro / $799 Enterprise / $1,499 White-Label</strong></td><td><strong>The only 11-seat, 9-vendor review panel with a published integrity gate</strong></td></tr>
</tbody> </tbody>
</table> </table>
<p class="table-note"> <p class="table-note">