Files
Germaine Brown 98073dc636
Publish Docs Site / build (push) Failing after 5s
feat: initial itpp-docs setup with MkDocs Material
- mkdocs.yml with dark slate theme, nav for 12 ITPP projects
- build-docs.sh aggregates docs from all project repos
- .gitea/workflows/docs-publish.yml for nightly rebuild+deploy
- README and CHANGELOG for the itpp-docs repo itself
- docs-source/ populated from all 12 repos
- site/ ready for deployment to docs.itpropartner.com
2026-08-09 23:49:45 -04:00

2.6 KiB

VerdictTank — Changelog

2026-08-07

Rebrand (SharkTank → VerdictTank)

  • Project renamed: /root/projects/sharktank → /root/projects/verdicttank
  • Mockup moved: mockup.iamgmb.com/sharktank → mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank
  • New proposal: proposals.iamgmb.com/verdicttank (incorporates all pipeline review feedback)
  • Original SharkTank proposal archived with "superseded" banner
  • Mockup landing page: removed all model names, added file upload (doc/docx/pdf), purged all em dashes
  • Proposals index: VerdictTank (primary) + SharkTank (archived, grayed out)
  • Critical review page: rebranded, em dashes purged

Pipeline Review Results

  • First dogfood: ran proposal through full VerdictTank pipeline
  • Verdict: 3/3 Unanimous Conditional Go
  • Phase 1 (Research Agent): No direct competitor found — cross-vendor architecture is novel
  • Phase 2 (Critic Agent): 4/10 average — 4 fatal flaws: trademark, pricing, financial model, no validation
  • Phase 3a (Judge A): Ratified 85% of critic — pricing > name in priority, rejected co-founder as condition
  • Phase 3b (Judge B): Caught overage incentive flaw, compound reliability risk (97.5% = 18hr/mo downtime)
  • Phase 3c (Judge C): Meta-layer insight, training-data recursion (Year 3), liability asymmetry, SEO desert
  • Critical review addendum: https://mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank/critical-review.html
  • Priority-ranked 11-item action plan with reconciled timeline (Apr 2027 paid launch)
  • Novel insights: product IS content, verdict confidence scoring, degraded-mode fallback needed

Updated Proposal (Post-Review)

  • Full rebrand to VerdictTank throughout
  • Tiered usage-based pricing (no "unlimited"): $19/$49/$99/$299 + $14.99 pay-per-review
  • Financial model with churn (5-7%), CAC ($15-25), LTV ($210-290), LTV:CAC (~10:1)
  • Real break-even estimate: 25-35 users (not 6)
  • Timeline pushed to Mar-Apr 2027 paid launch
  • New risks: training-data recursion, liability asymmetry, alignment drift, SEO desert
  • Pipeline described by roles only (no model names)
  • Pipeline self-review section with verdict banner
  • Added: degraded-mode fallback, benchmark accuracy report, advisory board plan
  • Product origin: dogfooding at IT Pro Partner

Pending

  • Register verdicttank.com domain
  • File VerdictTank trademark (USPTO Class 42)
  • Landing page + waitlist at verdicttank.com
  • Interview 20 target ICP users
  • Publish benchmark accuracy report (20 proposals, known outcomes)
  • Recruit 3+ named advisors
  • FastAPI backend with job queue
  • WeasyPrint PDF generation
  • Email delivery via MXroute
  • LiteLLM virtual key: verdicttank-prod