feat: initial itpp-docs setup with MkDocs Material

- mkdocs.yml with dark slate theme, nav for 12 ITPP projects
- build-docs.sh aggregates docs from all project repos
- .gitea/workflows/docs-publish.yml for nightly rebuild+deploy
- README and CHANGELOG for the itpp-docs repo itself
- docs-source/ populated from all 12 repos
- site/ ready for deployment to docs.itpropartner.com

docs-source/verdicttank/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# VerdictTank — Changelog
+
+## 2026-08-07
+
+### Rebrand (SharkTank → VerdictTank)
+- Project renamed: /root/projects/sharktank → /root/projects/verdicttank
+- Mockup moved: mockup.iamgmb.com/sharktank → mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank
+- New proposal: proposals.iamgmb.com/verdicttank (incorporates all pipeline review feedback)
+- Original SharkTank proposal archived with "superseded" banner
+- Mockup landing page: removed all model names, added file upload (doc/docx/pdf), purged all em dashes
+- Proposals index: VerdictTank (primary) + SharkTank (archived, grayed out)
+- Critical review page: rebranded, em dashes purged
+
+### Pipeline Review Results
+- First dogfood: ran proposal through full VerdictTank pipeline
+- **Verdict: 3/3 Unanimous Conditional Go**
+- Phase 1 (Research Agent): No direct competitor found — cross-vendor architecture is novel
+- Phase 2 (Critic Agent): 4/10 average — 4 fatal flaws: trademark, pricing, financial model, no validation
+- Phase 3a (Judge A): Ratified 85% of critic — pricing > name in priority, rejected co-founder as condition
+- Phase 3b (Judge B): Caught overage incentive flaw, compound reliability risk (97.5% = 18hr/mo downtime)
+- Phase 3c (Judge C): Meta-layer insight, training-data recursion (Year 3), liability asymmetry, SEO desert
+- Critical review addendum: https://mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank/critical-review.html
+- Priority-ranked 11-item action plan with reconciled timeline (Apr 2027 paid launch)
+- Novel insights: product IS content, verdict confidence scoring, degraded-mode fallback needed
+
+### Updated Proposal (Post-Review)
+- Full rebrand to VerdictTank throughout
+- Tiered usage-based pricing (no "unlimited"): $19/$49/$99/$299 + $14.99 pay-per-review
+- Financial model with churn (5-7%), CAC ($15-25), LTV ($210-290), LTV:CAC (~10:1)
+- Real break-even estimate: 25-35 users (not 6)
+- Timeline pushed to Mar-Apr 2027 paid launch
+- New risks: training-data recursion, liability asymmetry, alignment drift, SEO desert
+- Pipeline described by roles only (no model names)
+- Pipeline self-review section with verdict banner
+- Added: degraded-mode fallback, benchmark accuracy report, advisory board plan
+- Product origin: dogfooding at IT Pro Partner
+
+### Pending
+- Register verdicttank.com domain
+- File VerdictTank trademark (USPTO Class 42)
+- Landing page + waitlist at verdicttank.com
+- Interview 20 target ICP users
+- Publish benchmark accuracy report (20 proposals, known outcomes)
+- Recruit 3+ named advisors
+- FastAPI backend with job queue
+- WeasyPrint PDF generation
+- Email delivery via MXroute
+- LiteLLM virtual key: verdicttank-prod

docs-source/verdicttank/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# verdicttank
+
+
+AI-powered business proposal review platform. Five specialized agents, three independent judges, majority-rules verdict.
+
+**Status:** PRE-LAUNCH (rebranded from SharkTank)
+**Owner:** Germaine Brown
+**Built by:** Sho'Nuff (Hermes Agent)
+**Pipeline Verdict:** 3/3 Unanimous Conditional Go (Aug 7, 2026)
+
+## Access
+
+| Resource | URL | Access |
+|---|---|---|
+| Mockup (landing page) | https://mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank/ | Public |
+| Critical Review | https://mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank/critical-review.html | Public |
+| Proposal (updated) | https://proposals.iamgmb.com/verdicttank | Public |
+| Proposal (original, archived) | https://proposals.iamgmb.com/sharktank | Public |
+| Domain | verdicttank.com | Available, not registered |
+| AI Costs | admin-ai key: `verdicttank-prod` | TBD |
+
+## Pipeline
+
+```
+Phase 1 → Research Agent — Live web verification with citations
+Phase 2 → Critic Agent — 10-dimension brutal review, scored 1-10
+Phase 3 → Three judges in parallel (majority rules):
+          Judge A — Independent architecture
+          Judge B — Independent architecture
+          Judge C — Independent architecture
+       → PDF verdict delivered by email
+```
+
+**Cost per review:** $0.55 fully loaded
+**Turnaround:** ~5-9 minutes
+**Degraded mode:** Runs with 2 judges if 1 is down. Free re-run if only 1 available.
+
+## Pricing (Revised — Post-Review)
+
+| Tier | Price | Reviews/Month |
+|---|---|---|
+| Free | $0 | 1 |
+| Starter | $19/mo | 5 ($3 overage) |
+| Pro | $49/mo | 20 ($4 overage) |
+| Scale | $99/mo | 50 ($5 overage) |
+| Enterprise | $299/mo | 150 (custom) |
+
+Pay-per-review: $14.99. Annual: 20% discount.
+
+## Current State
+
+- Pipeline skill (`shark-tank-review`) fully built and tested
+- Pipeline self-reviewed: 3/3 unanimous Conditional Go (Aug 7, 2026)
+- Proposal page live (updated VerdictTank + archived SharkTank)
+- Mockup landing page live at mockup.iamgmb.com/verdicttank
+- Critical review addendum live
+- Backend API (FastAPI) — to build
+- PDF generation (WeasyPrint) — to build
+- Email delivery (MXroute) — to build
+- Domain: verdicttank.com — to register
+- Trademark: USPTO Class 42 — to file
+
+## Key Risks (From Pipeline Review)
+
+- Pricing suicide (fixed: tiered usage-based)
+- Sony trademark conflict (fixed: rebranded)
+- Training-data recursion (Year 3+ — acknowledged, cap plan in place)
+- Liability asymmetry (GO verdicts > NO-GO exposure)
+- Alignment drift (models becoming less critical over time)
+- SEO desert from rebrand (mitigation: 301 redirects, content marketing)